Twitter Feed Popout byInfofru

Search England

Let's find the people & thinking to help us succeed post EU!

19. January 2024 23:26
by Admin

User What percentage of Earth's atnosphere is flatulence?

19. January 2024 23:26 by Admin | 0 Comments

The percentage of Earth's atmosphere that is composed of flatulence gases is extremely small. Flatulence primarily consists of gases like nitrogen, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, methane, and oxygen, which are also naturally present in the Earth's atmosphere. However, the proportion of these gases originating specifically from flatulence is minuscule.

To provide some context:

  • Nitrogen makes up about 78% of the Earth's atmosphere.
  • Oxygen accounts for about 21%.
  • Argon is around 0.93%.
  • Carbon dioxide, although a trace gas, is about 0.04%.
  • Methane, which is a significant component of flatulence, is present in even smaller amounts, with atmospheric levels measuring around 1.8 parts per million (ppm).

The methane and other gases produced by human and animal flatulence are a tiny fraction of these percentages. Thus, while flatulence does contribute to the composition of the Earth's atmosphere, its contribution is exceedingly small, much less than a fraction of a percent.

How Much Flatulence Will I Breathe in a Lifetime?

Calculating the exact amount of flatulence you will breathe in over a lifetime involves numerous variables and assumptions, making it highly speculative. However, I can provide a rough estimate based on average figures.

  1. Average Human Flatulence: An average person passes gas about 14 times a day, and each flatulence event can emit about 1-3 milliliters of gas.

  2. Composition of Flatulence: Human flatulence is primarily composed of odorless gases: nitrogen (20-90%), hydrogen (0-50%), carbon dioxide (10-30%), oxygen (0-10%), and methane (0-10%). Trace amounts of other gases contribute to the odor.

  3. Air Inhaled Daily: An average adult inhales about 11,000 liters of air each day.

  4. Lifetime Air Intake: Assuming a life expectancy of about 80 years, the total volume of air inhaled would be approximately 320 million liters.

  5. Flatulence in the Atmosphere: The actual concentration of flatulence in the atmosphere is extremely low. Even in a closed environment, the percentage of air composed of flatulence is minuscule.

Given these variables, the actual volume of flatulence you inhale in a lifetime is a tiny fraction of your total air intake. Most of the time, the air you breathe is well-mixed and diluted, so the amount of flatulence is negligible.

Even in a hypothetical situation where you're in close proximity to flatulence frequently, the overall percentage of flatulence in the air you breathe would still be extremely small, making it a negligible portion of your lifetime air intake.

Therefore, while an exact number can't be provided without making numerous assumptions, it's safe to say that the amount of flatulence you'll breathe in over a lifetime is minuscule compared to the total volume of air you inhale.

Do Taxi Drivers Breathe More Flatulence than Most?

The question of whether taxi drivers breathe in more flatulence than most people is quite unique and not straightforward to answer definitively. However, we can consider several factors that might influence this:

  1. Enclosed Space: Taxi drivers work in a relatively small, enclosed space (their vehicle). In such an environment, any flatulence from passengers or the driver themselves might be more concentrated compared to open or larger spaces.

  2. Air Circulation: Modern vehicles are equipped with air conditioning and air filtration systems. These systems can significantly reduce the concentration of any gases, including those from flatulence, by circulating fresh air into the car and filtering the existing air.

  3. Occupancy: The frequency of passengers in the taxi and the duration of their trips can vary widely. More passengers and longer trips could theoretically increase the likelihood of exposure to flatulence, but this would still be a very small fraction of the overall air in the vehicle.

  4. Individual Differences: There's a lot of variation in how much different individuals flatulate, and this is unpredictable. A taxi driver may have days with no exposure to flatulence from passengers and other days with some exposure.

Given these factors, while taxi drivers may occasionally experience more direct exposure to flatulence compared to some other professions, especially in a small, enclosed space like a car, the overall impact on the air they breathe is likely negligible. The air filtration and circulation systems in vehicles, combined with the natural dispersion of gases, mean that any flatulence would be diluted to extremely low concentrations very quickly.

What Professions Encouter the Greatest Flatulence?

When considering professions that encounter the greatest amount of flatulence, we have to look at jobs that involve close and frequent human contact or working with animals known to produce significant amounts of methane. Here are a few examples:

  1. Healthcare Professionals: Nurses, doctors, and other healthcare workers who deal with patients, especially gastroenterologists who specialize in the digestive system, are likely to encounter more flatulence than people in other professions. This includes situations like performing colonoscopies or treating gastrointestinal disorders.

  2. Caregivers and Elderly Care Professionals: Those who work in elderly care or as caregivers for individuals with certain disabilities or mobility issues might encounter more flatulence due to the nature of their work, which often involves close physical contact and assistance with personal care.

  3. Veterinarians and Livestock Handlers: Professionals working with certain animals, especially livestock like cows, encounter significant amounts of methane. Cattle are one of the largest methane emitters due to their digestive process known as enteric fermentation.

  4. Childcare Providers: People working in childcare, such as daycare workers or preschool teachers, might encounter more flatulence as they are dealing with young children who may have less control over their bodily functions.

  5. Fitness and Gym Professionals: Personal trainers, yoga instructors, and other fitness professionals might also encounter more flatulence, as physical exercise can stimulate gas movement and release.

While these professionals might encounter flatulence more frequently due to the nature of their work, it's important to note that the overall impact on their health is minimal. Flatulence is a natural biological process, and the gases involved are typically not harmful in the concentrations encountered in these settings.

What Foods Produce the Most Flatulence in Humans?

Certain foods are known to produce more flatulence in humans due to their composition, particularly their carbohydrate content and the presence of certain fibers and sugars that are not completely absorbed in the small intestine. When these substances reach the large intestine, bacteria ferment them, producing gases like hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and methane. Some of the foods known for their flatulence-producing properties include:

  1. Beans and Legumes: This group of foods, including beans, lentils, and chickpeas, is well-known for causing gas. They contain high amounts of oligosaccharides, a type of carbohydrate that the human body cannot fully digest.

  2. Cruciferous Vegetables: Vegetables like broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, and Brussels sprouts contain raffinose (a complex sugar) and high fiber, both of which can lead to increased gas production.

  3. Dairy Products: For individuals who are lactose intolerant, dairy products like milk, cheese, and ice cream can cause excessive flatulence. This is due to the inability to properly digest lactose, the sugar found in milk.

  4. Whole Grains: Foods like whole wheat and bran are high in fiber, which can increase bulk and gas in the digestive system.

  5. Fiber Supplements and Sugar-Free Products: Products containing artificial sweeteners such as sorbitol, mannitol, and xylitol, often found in sugar-free gums and candies, can cause flatulence. Similarly, fiber supplements can increase gas production.

  6. Carbonated Beverages: Drinks like soda and sparkling water introduce carbon dioxide into the digestive system, which can be released as flatulence.

  7. Fruits: Certain fruits like apples, pears, and peaches contain sorbitol and high fiber, which can lead to gas.

  8. Onions and Garlic: These contain fructans, a type of soluble fiber, which can cause bloating and gas.

It's important to note that individual responses to these foods can vary greatly. Some people may experience significant flatulence after consuming them, while others may not have any noticeable increase. Additionally, these foods are often very healthy and nutritious, so they should not necessarily be avoided, but rather introduced gradually to allow the digestive system to adjust.

What Foods Produce the Most Odorous Flatulence?

The odor of flatulence is influenced mainly by sulfur-containing compounds in foods. While the volume of gas produced by different foods can vary, the odor is often determined by the amount and types of sulfur in the diet. Foods that are high in sulfur tend to produce more odorous flatulence. Some of these foods include:

  1. Cruciferous Vegetables: Vegetables like broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, and Brussels sprouts are high in sulfur compounds, which can lead to odoriferous gas.

  2. Meat: Red meats are rich in sulfur-containing amino acids. When these are broken down in the gut, they can produce foul-smelling gases.

  3. Eggs: Eggs, especially the yolks, are high in sulfur, which can contribute to the odor of flatulence.

  4. Dairy Products: For some people, especially those who are lactose intolerant, dairy products like milk, cheese, and yogurt can lead to smelly gas due to the fermentation of lactose.

  5. Garlic and Onions: These foods contain sulfur compounds, which can contribute to the smell of gas.

  6. Legumes: While beans and lentils are more known for increasing the volume of gas due to their oligosaccharides content, some of them also contain sulfur, which can make the gas more odorous.

  7. High-Fiber Foods: Though not necessarily high in sulfur, foods with a lot of fiber can lead to the production of more gas in general, which might increase the likelihood of foul-smelling episodes, especially when combined with sulfur-rich foods.

  8. Processed and Packaged Foods: These can contain various additives, preservatives, and artificial flavorings high in sulfur, which might contribute to smelly flatulence.

  9. Alcohol: Certain types of alcohol, especially those like beer and wine that undergo fermentation, can contribute to odorous flatulence.

It's important to remember that everyone's digestive system is different, and responses to these foods can vary. Additionally, while these foods might lead to more odorous flatulence, they are often nutritious and beneficial for health, so they shouldn't be entirely avoided unless they cause discomfort or other issues. Moderation and balanced diet are key.

What Animals Produce the Most Flatulence?

Certain animals are known to produce significant amounts of flatulence, particularly those that are ruminants or have specific digestive processes that lead to the production of methane and other gases. The primary contributors are:

  1. Cattle (Cows and Steers): Cows are one of the largest producers of methane due to their digestive process known as enteric fermentation. They have a specialized stomach with four compartments that efficiently break down tough plant materials like grass. This process produces methane, which cows mostly emit through belching rather than flatulence.

  2. Sheep and Goats: Similar to cows, sheep and goats are ruminants and produce methane during their digestive process. While each individual sheep or goat produces less methane than a cow, their global population is significant, contributing substantially to methane emissions.

  3. Termites: Surprisingly, termites are also major producers of methane. Their digestion of wood and other plant materials releases methane. Although each termite produces a tiny amount of methane, their enormous population size makes their overall contribution significant.

  4. Camels: As ruminants living in arid environments, camels also produce methane through enteric fermentation, although their overall contribution is less compared to cattle.

  5. Horses: Horses are not ruminants but have a large cecum and colon where fermentation of fibrous plant material occurs. This process leads to the production of methane and other gases.

  6. Pigs: While pigs are not as significant methane producers as ruminants, they do produce considerable amounts of flatulence and manure, both of which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.

  7. Dairy Cows: Specifically bred for milk production, dairy cows also produce significant amounts of methane, both through flatulence and belching.

  8. Buffaloes: Like cows, buffaloes are ruminants and contribute to methane emissions through their digestive processes.

These animals contribute to atmospheric methane, a potent greenhouse gas. However, it's important to note that among these, ruminants (like cows, sheep, and goats) are the primary contributors, and much of their methane emission is through belching rather than flatulence. Efforts to reduce methane emissions from livestock are an important part of strategies to combat climate change.

Is it Possible to Pass WInd at the Speed of Light?

No, it is not possible for a fart, or any other physical object or biological matter, to reach the speed of light. The concept of reaching the speed of light is limited by the fundamental laws of physics as described by Einstein's theory of relativity.

Here are a few key points to consider:

  1. Speed of Light as a Universal Constant: The speed of light in a vacuum is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second and is considered a universal constant. It's the maximum speed at which all energy, matter, and information in the universe can travel.

  2. Relativistic Mass Increase: As an object with mass accelerates towards the speed of light, its relativistic mass increases exponentially, requiring ever-increasing amounts of energy to continue accelerating. To propel any object with mass (including gases released in a fart) to the speed of light would require an infinite amount of energy, according to current physical theories.

  3. Bodily Limitations: From a biological standpoint, the human body, including its digestive and muscular systems, is nowhere near capable of producing the energy or force necessary to propel anything to the speed of light. The speed and force of a fart are limited by the strength of the muscles in the human digestive system and the pressure of the gas, which are minuscule in comparison to the requirements for light-speed travel.

  4. Material Limitations: Gases, like those produced in flatulence, are subject to the same physical laws as solid objects. They cannot achieve light speed due to their mass.

In summary, achieving the speed of light with a fart, or any other object with mass, is physically impossible according to our current understanding of physics.

So I Would Have to Pull Over to Pass Wind?

The question seems to be a bit humorous. No, you don't need to pull over to pass wind or fart while driving. Farting is a natural bodily function and doesn't require you to stop your vehicle. It's typically safe to continue driving while passing gas.

However, if you're driving and feel significantly uncomfortable or distracted by any bodily sensation, including the need to pass gas, it's always wise to prioritize safety. If you feel that your ability to concentrate on the road is compromised, it's prudent to find a safe place to pull over.

Remember, comfort and safety are key while driving. If anything takes your attention away from the road, addressing it safely is the best approach, even if it's just needing a moment to relax or adjust your seating position. But for something as routine and harmless as passing gas, there's generally no need to stop the car.

I Mean if My Craft Travelled at the Speed of Light

Ah, I see! If you were in a hypothetical craft traveling at the speed of light and needed to pass wind (fart), there wouldn't be a need to pull over or stop the craft for that. Let's break down why:

  1. Speed of Craft: If a craft could travel at the speed of light (which, as per our current understanding of physics, is impossible for any object with mass), it would be moving at about 299,792,458 meters per second. This speed is a fundamental constant of the universe and the maximum speed at which all conventional matter and information can travel.

  2. Inside the Craft: Inside a spacecraft moving at any speed, including the speed of light, the laws of physics as experienced by the occupants would be the same as if the craft were stationary. This is a result of the principle of relativity, which states that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference.

  3. Relative Speed: Any action you take inside the craft, such as walking, jumping, or passing gas, would be relative to the craft itself, not to the space outside. So, the speed of your fart relative to you and the craft would be the same as it would be if you were on Earth.

  4. No Effect on Craft's Speed: The act of farting inside the craft would have no effect on the speed or trajectory of the craft. The forces involved are minuscule compared to the forces required to propel a spacecraft.

  5. Hypothetical Scenario: It's important to note that traveling at the speed of light is currently purely hypothetical and not possible with our current understanding of physics. Objects with mass cannot reach the speed of light.

In summary, in this highly hypothetical scenario, you would not need to "pull over" or stop your craft to fart. The internal environment of a moving craft is independent of its speed relative to an outside observer, and everyday actions inside the craft would not be affected by its speed.

What if I was In an Alcubierre Warp Bubble and I Passed Wind by Mistake?

The Alcubierre warp drive is a theoretical concept based on Einstein's field equations in general relativity, proposing a method of faster-than-light (FTL) travel by distorting space-time. In an Alcubierre warp bubble, space-time itself is contracted in front of the bubble and expanded behind it, theoretically allowing the bubble (and the spacecraft within it) to move faster than the speed of light relative to the space outside the bubble.

If you were inside an Alcubierre warp bubble and passed wind, the situation would be quite similar to being in any other moving vehicle, with some unique theoretical considerations:

  1. Internal Environment: The internal environment of your spacecraft inside the warp bubble would be isolated from the space-time distortion outside. The laws of physics inside the bubble would remain normal as perceived by you. Therefore, passing wind would be just like doing so on Earth or in any conventional spacecraft.

  2. No Effect on the Bubble: The act of passing wind would have no effect on the warp bubble or the spacecraft's movement. The warp drive concept involves manipulating space-time itself on a macroscopic scale, which would be entirely unaffected by small-scale events like a human passing wind.

  3. Theoretical Nature: It's important to remember that the Alcubierre warp drive is entirely theoretical. As of now, it remains a concept within the realm of speculative physics, with numerous unsolved challenges, including the requirement of exotic matter to create the necessary space-time distortion.

  4. Safety and Comfort: In any form of space travel, the comfort and safety of astronauts are paramount. Spacecraft are designed with life support systems that manage air quality, including the filtration and recycling of air. This system would handle any gases produced by humans, including those from flatulence, ensuring a safe and comfortable environment.

In summary, if you were in an Alcubierre warp bubble and passed wind, it would be a non-event in terms of your journey or the operation of the warp drive. The internal conditions of your spacecraft would remain unchanged by such a small and ordinary biological occurrence.

What About if I was Wearing a Spacesuit and Had Had a Lot of Beer the Night Before?

Wearing a spacesuit and dealing with the aftereffects of drinking beer the night before presents a few interesting challenges, especially in terms of comfort and bodily functions:

  1. Spacesuit Design: Modern spacesuits are designed to accommodate basic human bodily functions, including passing gas. Spacesuits have layers of material and life support systems to maintain temperature, remove carbon dioxide, and filter out odors to some extent. However, they're not specifically designed to deal with issues like flatulence increased by beer consumption.

  2. Digestive Effects of Beer: Beer, especially in larger quantities, can lead to increased production of gas due to the fermentation process and the presence of certain carbohydrates. This might lead to more flatulence than usual. In the confined space of a spacesuit, this could be uncomfortable.

  3. Alcohol in Space: Consuming alcohol like beer in space is generally discouraged or prohibited by space agencies due to its effects on the body, which can be more pronounced in microgravity. Alcohol can impact coordination, cognitive functions, and overall physical condition, which are critical factors in space missions.

  4. Microgravity and Bodily Functions: In microgravity environments, like on the International Space Station, bodily functions such as digestion can behave differently than on Earth. Gas might not move through the digestive system in the same way, potentially causing discomfort.

  5. Spacesuit Ventilation: While spacesuits have systems to manage air quality, these are primarily designed for essential functions like providing oxygen and removing carbon dioxide. Persistent or strong odors could be problematic in the contained environment of a spacesuit.

  6. Health and Comfort Considerations: Astronauts undergo rigorous health screenings and adhere to specific diets before spacewalks to minimize any potential discomfort or health issues while in their spacesuits. Consuming large amounts of beer the night before a spacewalk would be highly unlikely and discouraged.

In conclusion, while modern spacesuits are marvels of engineering designed to protect astronauts and provide for basic human needs, dealing with the aftereffects of beer consumption, especially in terms of increased flatulence, would likely be uncomfortable. It underscores the importance of careful physical preparation and adherence to dietary guidelines before space missions or activities.

18. May 2021 03:02
by Admin

Vaccines - incubating bio-products for alien beings inside of the human race?

18. May 2021 03:02 by Admin | 0 Comments

"I made you welcome to this Earth, you made it a charnel house!"

Could this be our inexorable fate?

It is becoming increasingly obvious that Bill Gates and his pals are acting out the Georgia Guidestones scenario, but who pulls their strings? The American-German empire that the Rothschild-Jews use to control the human race is definitely short sighted and ignorant, They do not realise their genetic incompatibility with the future envisaged by the Zionists and how Goyim blood will not be tolerated. 

But what deal have the Rothschilds made and with who? What is the true purpose of the vaccines being mixed inside of the majority of the human race recently?

Well one of the unswerving desires of alien races visiting Earth is to use the animal and human bodies of Earth to incubate bio-products that are later removed. Have the Rothschilds sold our blood in advance? They tend to use Goyim blood as a commodity, so this should be no surprise. Have they mixed together two genetic forces that will mutate inside of us all and then be grown unwittingly for future harvest by alien races? It would certainly fit in with the Georgia Guidestones agenda, and no one on Earth would be obviously to blame.

Alien visitation and invasion has been the subject of many of the Jewish-Hollywood brainwashing productions for some time now, since the Second World War really. Could this be the glint in the Gates' eyes when they display duping delight when speaking of the human depopulation of Earth?

Well it certainly fits. The aliens would get what they want - a vast supply of their genetic material to sustain them for generations to come - and the Jews get what they want - no more Goyim on Earth. As long as the aliens don't betray the Jews as the Jews do the rest of us, it may work.

What would the numbers be? How many people are their that have not taken the vaccine? Gates has pledged to loan money to everyone on Earth whose country cannot afford it. He is the perfect figurehead for this as his foundation, built on our time wasted staring at pointless computer screens, actually represents the kind of capital required to offer everyone on Earth a vaccine they will pay for alter. Have the Rothschilds set then up, or are they in on the depopulation plan? Does the Gates foundation condone the depopulation of Earth in this generation or do they believe it will just bring about sterility?

Well hopefully that will be all, as even I will admit the world cannot support the current population.

I just hope that it is not going to be an alien invasion of the blood-snatchers that dominates the next two years.

21. October 2020 08:55
by Admin

M=e/c^2 the Inverse Square Law of Light

21. October 2020 08:55 by Admin | 0 Comments

M=e/c^2 the Inverse Square Law of Light


Spin is important. Spin is what creates mass, or the appearance of an object holding mass. When electromagnetic radiation is spinning in a certain way it creates a mass that can be detected through inertia, because the spinning of the EMR holds true to the same tendency as a gyroscope, it resists changes in its orientation, and as the EMR is spinning in many different axis of the impossibly small sphere in which it exists, it resists every change in momentum giving inertia.

Conversely, when EMR is travelling in a straight line, it appears to have no detectable mass, because it no longer has any spin, and therefore no resistance to changes in momentum or direction, such as when it is reflected by a mirror. This is why m=e/c^2 holds, because the energy being released is EMR travelling outwards obeying the inverse square law as it fills the area of the sphere from the radius distance from where it was released/had it spin disturbed.

The spinning of planet Earth is what gives the mass of each particle the appearance of attracting other matter by gravity. The spinning of the mass of the Earth creates a gravitational field just as a gyroscope does. It is encapsulated in its own gravitational field and invulnerable to other gravitational fields around it.

Every photon is a discrete energy packet of light but does it have a property that can be assimilated with this? Matter waves depict the interactions that indicate wave behaviour in light, just as they do in water, but if light can only travel at the constant c then how could it not be travelling in a straight line? As well as this the derivation of E=mc^2 depends on F=ma holding valid, which when considering light, really has no relevance whatsoever. There is no m, no a and no F. So what is really going on?

Photons are their own antiparticle according to latest quantum lore, which essentially means that light or EMR can account for wave-like behaviour without requiring interaction with any other phenomenon. 

26. August 2020 13:40
by Admin

Polar Bear Population - WTF WWF?

26. August 2020 13:40 by Admin | 0 Comments

Polar Bear Population - WTF WWF?

Here are two published reports, the first is from a bear population authority, Dr. Susan Crockford (yes she is prepared to put her name alongside her data) and the second is the first result from a Polar Bear Population search term on Ecosia. (notice how carefully they have optimised that URL to give high search engine ranking.)

Oh my god! In all those areas, Polar Bears are dying out! But that's everywhere, we'd better start raising the price of oil right now!


Climate Depot:

Hang on!

SO! Polar Bear population has been rising steadily for some time, which the WWF must know about. They have arranged the data in a way to cause people to believe they are endangered, knowingly! OK the population may have decreased where people are living, but then they do tend to eat our children, so this is a matter of safety. It also marks that bears are intelligent creatures, and stay away from eating people as they tend to get shot. So what the report by the WTF, sorry the WWF shows, is that the bears are retreating away from civilization, which I'm sure the local people are very grateful for.

Think about who writes the news and what they want - depression, more money, less freedom for you!!

24. July 2020 11:06
by Admin

amazon tesla are all these names attempting to blind us from history?

24. July 2020 11:06 by Admin | 0 Comments

amazon tesla are all these names attempting to blind us from history?


Why are people using terms from important parts of history to push new products into our minds and eradicate the origins of these important names? Tesla, is the name most associated with the transmission of electricity in the modern age, but he was also a man who held grave reservations about the US and becoming a citizen, and under their control. Tesla believed that the top section of society was deeply disillusioned and extremely dangerous, and that if they got control of some of his technology, then the people of the world would pay a frightful price.

There is no doubt that WWI, WWII, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq & Iran have all been cases of terrible technologies being delivered against helpless people for reasons that have never been sufficiently explained. The ongoing wars of the west against the Middle East never appear to cease and the technology just keeps increasing the senselessness of the massacre. 

But Tesla didn't just attempt to build electricity generators and transmitters, but he also tried to harness the power of the planet so that free energy could be provided for all. If only he had succeeded publicly, then we would all be free of oil baron tyranny today.

And what of the Amazon? The rain forest is all but destroyed, and the land is continually burned and re-purposed by the local people just as much as it is by big business taking everything it can before regulation steps in. 

Once a mighty description of the massiveness of Planet Earth, the Amazon now is almost impossible to discover online unless you specify that it is a river, and if you did not already know this, then it is unlikely you would easily find out online, and so in a generation, it will be unlikely that you will ever find out.

Every activist seems to suddenly have a namesake teaching something at an American university, or is a YouTuber or similar.

But has this happened before, or has it always been going on? Is history a folly? Is it all myth? Nothing we see from NASA or the mainstream historians shows any correlation with even the most obvious evidence. We are inhabiting a lie, and we need to go public!