Electromagnetics and supercavitation are different phenomena, but both have the potential to reduce resistance in their respective domains. Let's explore the concepts:

1. Supercavitation: Supercavitation is a phenomenon where a layer of gas bubbles surrounds an object moving through a liquid, significantly reducing drag. This is because gas (like the vapor bubble) has much lower viscosity and density than the liquid (like water). This technique is used in torpedoes to achieve high speeds underwater. The main challenge is to initiate and maintain the cavitation bubble around the object.

2. Electromagnetics: The idea here would be to use electromagnetism to create a "buffer" or "shield" around an object to reduce air resistance. In theory, if you could ionize the air around an object, creating a plasma, you could then use magnetic fields to shape or control that plasma to reduce drag.

Potential applications and challenges:

1. Plasma Actuators: These are devices that can ionize the air close to a surface, creating a layer of plasma. By doing so, they can influence the boundary layer of air, potentially reducing drag. These actuators have been researched for potential use in aviation and other applications, but they typically work best at high speeds and might not provide a significant benefit at lower speeds.

2. Magnetic Fields: While magnetic fields can influence plasma, air is generally non-magnetic. Thus, creating a significant reduction in drag using just magnetic fields would be challenging.

3. Energy Consumption: Ionizing air and maintaining a plasma state would require a significant amount of energy. It's crucial to weigh the energy required against the potential energy savings from reduced drag.

4. Heat and Material Challenges: Plasma is extremely hot. Any system that aims to use plasma to reduce drag would need to account for the heat generated, ensuring that it doesn't damage the vehicle or compromise its structural integrity.

5. Environmental and Health Concerns: Ionizing air can produce ozone and other potentially harmful byproducts. Any widespread application of such technology would need to consider the environmental and health impacts.

In conclusion, while it's an intriguing idea to use electromagnetics to reduce air resistance in a way analogous to supercavitation in water, the challenges are significant. The principles behind each phenomenon are different, and while research is ongoing in the domain of plasma aerodynamics, practical, large-scale applications might still be a way off. 

Using a layer of vacuum around a vehicle to reduce air resistance is an interesting theoretical concept. In essence, a vacuum has no air, and thus, no air resistance (drag). If a vehicle were surrounded by a vacuum layer, it would, in theory, face no aerodynamic drag from the surrounding medium. However, there are several challenges and considerations:

1. Creating a Vacuum: Maintaining a stable layer of vacuum around a moving vehicle is technically very challenging. Any structure attempting to hold a vacuum around the vehicle would need to be incredibly strong to withstand atmospheric pressure without collapsing.

2. Stability: Even if you could maintain a vacuum layer, the vehicle's stability would be a concern. Aerodynamic shapes not only reduce drag but also provide stability. A vehicle in a vacuum might not handle well, especially at high speeds.

3. Transition Zones: The zones where the vacuum meets the surrounding air would be areas of intense turbulence and could create other aerodynamic challenges.

4. Safety: In the event of a breach of the vacuum layer, the sudden reintroduction of atmospheric pressure could be catastrophic.

5. Energy Consumption: The energy required to maintain such a vacuum (especially if any breach occurs and needs to be reestablished) might outweigh the energy saved from reduced drag.

6. Size and Weight: The machinery and structures required to maintain a vacuum layer would add weight and size to the vehicle, potentially offsetting any benefits gained from reduced drag.

7. Other Resistance: Even if aerodynamic drag is eliminated, vehicles still face other types of resistance, like rolling resistance for ground vehicles.

8. Environmental Impact: Depending on the mechanism used to create and maintain the vacuum, there might be environmental concerns or impacts to consider.

While the idea of using a vacuum to eliminate air resistance is theoretically appealing, the practical challenges are significant. Current aerodynamic research tends to focus on more feasible methods of drag reduction, such as improving vehicle shapes, using materials with specific surface properties, or manipulating the boundary layer with techniques like vortex generators or plasma actuators. 

Yes, diamagnetic effects can be used to induce repulsion in certain materials when they are exposed to a magnetic field. All materials display some degree of diamagnetism, but the effect is generally very weak in most substances. However, certain materials, like bismuth or graphite, have a relatively stronger diamagnetic response.

The concept you're referring to is often called "magnetic levitation" or "maglev." Here's how it can be applied to vehicles:

1. Maglev Trains: This is the most well-known application of magnetic levitation. Maglev trains levitate above their tracks, eliminating the friction between the train wheels and rails. They use a combination of permanent magnets and electromagnets to achieve this. The lack of physical contact allows these trains to achieve very high speeds with a smooth ride.

2. Diamagnetic Levitation: While maglev trains typically use electromagnetic levitation, it's also possible to levitate objects using purely diamagnetic materials in the presence of a strong magnetic field. However, the forces involved are generally much weaker than those in a typical maglev system.

3. Vehicle Hulls: In theory, if you had a vehicle hull made of (or coated with) a strongly diamagnetic material and you exposed it to a powerful magnetic field, you could reduce or eliminate its contact with a surface. However, the magnetic fields required would be extremely strong, and the levitation effect might be minimal. It would be challenging to make this practical for large vehicles, especially given the energy required to maintain such magnetic fields.

4. Other Considerations: Using powerful magnetic fields could have other effects on the vehicle's systems or passengers. For example, electronic systems might be affected, and there could be health considerations for passengers.

5. Friction Reduction: Even if full levitation is not achieved, reducing contact (and thus friction) with the vehicle's hull might improve efficiency or reduce wear and tear.

6. Space Applications: In the vacuum of space, other factors, like magnetic fields from the Sun or other celestial bodies, could potentially interact with a spacecraft's diamagnetic hull. However, the practical applications and benefits would need further exploration.

In conclusion, while the concept of using diamagnetic effects to reduce contact with a vehicle's hull is intriguing, there are significant challenges to overcome, especially when considering the strength of the magnetic fields required and the relatively weak diamagnetic properties of even the most diamagnetic materials. Nonetheless, maglev technology based on electromagnetic principles has been successfully implemented and continues to be researched for various transportation solutions.