There is not much to say, just take a look:

The Rothschilds must have planned the first and second world wars with the new world order in the US. They realsied that they could not stay in the Middle East without the protection of a new super power and so struck a deal with the Americans in the 1740s and 50s. Washington was organised to murder French troops and distract the European powers whilst the Jews organised the new US/World leaders or 'Founding Fathers' who would betray their own European race in order to become leaders of the New World. Some believed it would take three World Wars but two sufficed. The Second World War allowing the Jews to transform a people who had fled Europe to avoid war into the most destructive war machine in history. The new 'super power' would guard Israel from the rest of the Middle East and the Rothschilds had only to take their Jewish Banking offspring to take over the European banks and transfer all of the wealth to the US and Israel. Now their control is so complete, that they no longer require the US and the 'Georgia Guidestones' mob will happily destroy their own races to enter some sort of fantasy harmony with the Planet Earth. 

Of course the Jews will then be the majority and will have no use for the US and enslave the German part fo their population and destroy the rest of us. 

And then they will be revealed to have been the Devil all along...

It is finally becoming clear why none of the children died from COVID, making COVID an obvious anomaly compared to all other diseases throughout history. The disease was not transmitted through germ theory or created in a lab and disseminated through the water or the air as Pasteur's questionable Germ Theory explains. This was injected into the elderly under the excuse of a Flu Vaccine and so it began to kill the old and give the authorities an excuse to inject the least profitable sections of society first, whose deaths could be explained away as just being old, or the flu or COVID. Now we have reached a stage where everyone has been injected with a 5G activated nano-router, neuron control tech that degenerates over time in the body, and so a regular 'booster' technology needs to be re-injected regularly. 

We were made to wear masks:

Deuteronomy 11:18

“You shall therefore lay up these words of mine in your heart and in your soul, and you shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes."

Once the forces of evil have shut down the masses once more, they will proceed with their plan to destroy and enslave the Goy and enslave the Jew with the mark of the Beast.

Will the Beast's mark will be a chip, a cryptocurrency payment device that will enslave humanity forever. Everyone wearing the mark of the Beast will be lost to eternity?

Is the Apple logo the mark of the Beast?

It is certainly an apple with a bite taken out of it. Is it the apple that Eve bit into that damned the human race forever?

What about the Apple watch? It has the logo on the back, which means it is on your wrist.

And no one could buy or sell anything without that mark, which was either the name of the beast or the number representing his name.

Is this a mis-translation? Should the mark actually just be a mark or a logo?

Here they are paying with the mark against their wrist, which appears on his right hang in the reflection on the robot which he is giving his life away to.

When will all of this become too much of a coincidence?

When you start learning the past tense, that is il passato prossimo, you run into the unique situation (at least for native English speakers) of having to not only figure out what the equivalent is of the verb you want to use, but also a second verb that you combine it with.
Let me paint a clearer picture for you.

I want to say two sentences:

— Yesterday I talked to Marco.

— Then, we went to the club.

In Italian, here’s what would happen in my head:

Okay, so the word for yesterday is “ieri.” Great. Now, if I want to say “I talked,” I know that the past participle of “parlare” is “parlato.” Then I have to use the verb “avere” as the auxiliary verb, and since it’s me doing the action, it’s “ho,” so “ho parlato.” Then of course, the preposition is “con.”

Ieri ho parlato con Marco.

Avere = Auxiliary verb

Parlato = Past participle of “parlare”

However, in the next sentence, things change slightly.

So, the word I want to use for “then” is “poi.” Then I know that the past participle for “andare” is “andato” and that the auxiliary verb here to use is “essere,” Then the preposition is “in” and “club” is “discoteca”. However, since there are two of us, “essere” is conjugated as “siamo” and the ending of “andato” is replaced with an -i, making it “andati.”

Poi siamo andati in discoteca.

Essere = Auxiliary verb

Andato = Past participle

I break this down to the tiniest detail so you can all of the moving parts in front of your eyes that go into using auxiliary verbs, and knowing how to choose between “avere” and “essere” is incredibly important because you’re going to be using auxiliary verbs in more tenses than just the past.

So you have two choices here – avere and essere.

Which one do you choose?

How to Choose Between Avere and Essere

While there are a handful of exceptions, you choose “essere” with verbs that describe movement, a state of being, or a condition, like “andare – to go,” “uscire – to go out,” or “succedere – to happen.” Reflexive verbs, like “alzarsi – to get up” are always conjugated with “essere.”

“Avere” is typically used with all other verbs, like “parlare – to speak,” “mangiare – to eat,” or “imparare – to learn.”

What are some of the exceptions?

— Camminare – to walk: Even though this verb deals with motion, it takes “avere” as its auxiliary verb.

— Diventare – to become: This is one that you might not be sure about, but it does take the verb “essere” as an auxiliary.

— Rimanere – to stay: Even though nothing is technically changing when you’re staying in one place, this verb takes “essere” as an auxiliary verb as well.

Transitive or intransitive?

Another way that you could decide which verb to use is to recognize whether the meaning of the verb is transitive or intransitive. What does that mean?
Transitive verbs are ones that require a direct object, like “I finished my homework.” What did I finish? The homework — that’s the direct object. These types of verbs take “avere.” Intransitive verbs, on the other hand, don’t require an object and often represent a change of state or condition, like “The movie is over.” It was playing, but now it’s over. It’s changed its state. These types of verbs take “essere.”

Here’s a longer list of common verbs that take “avere”:

— Fare – to do/to make

— Portare – to bring

— Vedere – to see

— Sentire – to smell, hear, taste

— Aspettare – to wait

— Bere – to drink

— Capire – to understand

— Chiedere – to ask

— Credere – to believe, to think

— Cominciare – to begin

— Comprare – to buy

— Dare – to give

— Dire – to say

— Finire – to finish

— Imparare – to learn

— Pensare – to think

— Perdere – to lose, to miss

— Potere – to be able to, can

— Scrivere – to write

— Spiegare – to explain

— Vivere – to live

— Volere – to want

Here’s a longer list of common verbs that take “essere”:

— Abituarsi – to get used to

— Arrivare – to arrive

— Entrare – to enter

— Mettersi – to get dressed

— Morire – to die

— Nascere – to be born

— Partire – to leave

— Perdersi – to get lost

— Rimanere – to stay

— Riuscire – to be able to, to succeed (at)

— Salire – to go up

— Scendere – to descend, get off

— Stare – to be

— Tornare – to return

— Venire – to come

And then some verbs swing both ways (if you know what I mean).

There are a whole lot of verbs that can swing both ways, so I’ll just highlight five popular ones that you may hear or use in daily conversation.

— Cambiare – to change: When you’re talking about changing an object, like getting a new job (ho cambiato lavoro), you use “avere” as the auxiliary. But when you’re talking about someone changing (in quel periodo sono cambiato molto), you use “essere” as the auxiliary.

— Correre – to run, to be in a hurry: When you’re talking about running, you would use “avere” as the auxiliary, but when you’re talking about being in a hurry, you would use “essere”.

— Crescere – to grow, to raise: When you’re talking about how someone grew up, you use “essere” as the auxiliary (sono cresciuto/a in Michigan), but when you’re talking about someone raising children, you use “avere”  (mia madre mi ha cresciuto/a da sola).

— Finire – to finish: When you’re talking about a person finishing something, like homework, you use “avere” (ho finito i compiti), but when you’re talking about something being finished, like a movie, you use “essere” (il film è finito).

— Piovere – to rain: Typically you can use both “essere” and “avere” as the auxiliary verb here, but when you’re using “piovere” to talk about something more metaphorical, like people pouring in from a different country (500.000 di persone sono piovuti sull’Italia), then you would use “essere.

— Scendere – to go down: When you’re talking about getting off of something, like a bus, you use “essere” (sono sceso/a dall’autobus). When you’re talking about going down something, like a set of stairs, you use “avere” (ho sceso le scale).

Transitive:

The word transitive comes from the Latin transire meaning ‘to pass’, ‘to cross’, ‘to go beyond’, therefore it describes actions that move from the subject or doer directly to the object, without making use of prepositions such as di, da, per, a etc.
Examples:
The classic example that we learn at school is: io mangio la mela (I eat the apple); in this sentence io is the subject of the verb, mangio is the transitive verb, and la mela is the direct object.
It’s not always necessary to express the direct object, for example: la sera mangio presto (in the evening I eat early). Here, the direct object would be ‘dinner’, ‘meal’, or ‘food’, but it is implicit rather than expressed.
Another example would be: Giovanni guida la macchina per andare a lavorare (Giovanni drives his car to go to work). Here, guidare is a transitive verb because it is followed by the direct object, la macchina. However I could also omit ‘la macchina’ and simply say Giovanni guida per andare a lavorare.

Intransitive:
When using intransitive verbs, the action does not move directly from the subject to the object but makes use of a preposition such as di, da, in, a etc.
Some important intransitive verbs are those which don’t express an action but rather a state or a condition, such as essere (to be), stare (to stay), divenire (to become), or movement such as andare (to go), venire (to come), arrivare (to arrive), etc. When using these verbs we frequently add information, such as ‘where’, ‘when’, ‘how’, ‘for how long’, and so on.
Examples:
il treno è arrivato in stazione (the train arrived at the station). Here, il treno is the subject, è arrivato is the intransitive verb, in stazione is the indirect object introduced by the preposition in
sto in ufficio tutto il pomeriggio (I’ll be in the office all afternoon)
Giovanni va al lavoro in macchina (Giovanni goes to work by car)